---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Kim Ringeisen <kim@ropewalk.io>
Date: Tue, May 19, 2026 at 1:52PM
Subject: Response to May 18, 2026 BOC discussion: public input on John A. Holmes High School project funding
To: <board@chowan.nc.gov>
Cc: Stallings, Susanne <susanne.stallings@chowan.nc.gov>, <kevin.howard@chowan.nc.gov>

 

Dear Chair and Commissioners,

 

At the May 18, 2026 regular meeting, during the Board's discussion of jail funding options, Chair Kirby stated that citizens appeared to be forgetful or to have bad memories about the Board's deliberations and citizen input on the John A. Holmes High School project.
  

The attached letter responds to that assertion with the Chowan County meeting record itself, covering 2019 through May 2026. It includes a short summary, a timeline at a glance, and full citations from official County records. 

 

The letter also asks the Board one specific question, and requests publication of three documents referenced in the meeting record but not included in any posted agenda packet.  If information changes the timeline or meeting occurrence, I will update my records with any missing data corrected by your response. 

 

Thank you for your consideration.

 Kim Ringeisen
527 Yeopim Road, 405 S Broad Sreet,  Edenton

 

 

==============================================

 

Note: See County Response below

 

Letter to Chair and Chowan Board of Commissioners, May 19, 2026

Kim Ringeisen 527 Yeopim Road Edenton, NC 27932 kim@ropewalk.io

May 19, 2026

 

The Honorable Chair and Members of the Chowan County Board of Commissioners

 

Re: Public input on the John A. Holmes High School project funding, $50M authorization to $85M

ceiling

 

Dear Chair and Commissioners:

At the May 18, 2026 regular meeting, during the Board’s discussion of jail funding options, Chair Kirby

stated that the Board had held many discussions on the Holmes High School project, that he had a stack of

papers concerning the project’s details, and that citizens appeared to be forgetful or to have bad memories

about the Board’s deliberations and citizen input on the project.

 

I write to address that assertion directly. The Board’s own meeting record, from 2019 through May 2026, is

summarized in the timeline and citations attached to this letter. The short version follows.

 

What the record shows

September 17, 2019. One publicly advertised hearing on the Holmes High School project. The project was

being discussed at that time under a bond approach that would have required a citizen vote.

November 3, 2020. Chowan voters rejected the quarter-cent Article 46 sales tax tied to the project, 52.56 to

47.44 percent.

March 22, 2021.   At the Joint Board of County Commissioners and Board of Education Committee meeting,

USDA financing was formally presented to the Board by the County’s outside financial advisor, Davenport

Public Finance, as a case projecting “no impact on the current tax rate” at a $50M project scope. At the same

meeting, the construction company representative on the project, Mr. Rick Ott of MB Kahn, spoke directly on

USDA loan timing: “if the school occupies the building in July 2024 the first payment on a USDA loan would

not be due until the 2025/26 fiscal year.” Less than a month later, on April 19, 2021, the Board adopted

USDA financing at $50M.

April 19, 2021. Board authorized the project at $50M via USDA loan. No publicly advertised hearing.

May 2, 2022. Board held a publicly advertised hearing for the much smaller DF Walker loan. The format was

available, and the Board knew how to use it.

September 5, 2023. Board increased the project ceiling to $85M. No publicly advertised hearing.

 

Through May 18, 2026. Every later funding action, including multiple change orders and budget

amendments, was handled at a regular meeting with the standard three-minute public comment slot.

A three-minute public comment slot at a regular meeting is not the same as a publicly advertised hearing on a

project’s scope or funding. The first lets a resident speak for three minutes on any topic, with no requirement

that the Board provide the project terms in advance. The second is announced in the legal notices ahead of

time, with the loan terms and project scope made available for citizens to review and prepare informed

comments on the specific decision before it is made.After the Board pivoted to USDA financing, no publicly advertised hearing was held on the loan terms or the

project cost at either the $50M authorization or the $85M ceiling. Citizens now raising the project’s cost

growth are responding to the record itself, not to forgotten or mistaken memories of citizen input that the

record does not reflect. They are also responding to the second tax increase they are being asked to bear for

the cost of this new high school: the 3-cent General Fund rate increase adopted in the FY 2024-25 Budget

Ordinance, and the proposed FY 2026-27 rate of 60.25 cents, which is 5 cents above the published revenue-

neutral rate of 55.25 cents.

 

The question I am asking

Will the Board identify any publicly advertised hearing, as distinct from a regular meeting with three-

minute public comment, at which either the April 19, 2021 authorization of the Holmes High School

project at approximately $50M in USDA loan financing, or the September 5, 2023 ceiling of

approximately $85M, was presented to citizens for review before approval? If such an advertised hearing

occurred at either tier, please provide the date and the BOC agenda reference. If no such hearing

occurred, the meeting record itself establishes that fact.

 

Missing documents I am asking the Board to publish

Three documents that the meeting record references as informing Board decisions on the Holmes High

School project do not appear to have been posted in any BOC agenda packet for citizen review. I ask that the

Board publish them:

1.The USDA-required feasibility study, referenced at the February 14, 2022, June 20, 2022, and July 11, 2022

2. BOC meetings.   Any updated Davenport & Associates financial analysis prepared after the April 5, 2021 “no impact on

current tax rate” projection. That projection was based on the $50M project scope; the public meeting

record does not reflect an updated analysis for the $85M ceiling adopted September 5, 2023.

3.  The Construction Manager at Risk contract between Chowan County and MB Kahn, referenced in BOC

minutes from January 2022 forward.

 

Each of these bears directly on the project’s funding and the tax-rate effect on Chowan property owners.

 

How this compares to the jail funding discussion

The Board’s discussion of jail funding at the May 18, 2026 meeting was careful and detailed, with a proposed

$4.2M buy-in to join the Albemarle District Jail discussed alongside annual operational costs. The careful

review the jail decision is receiving now, and the publicly advertised hearing the Board held for the much

smaller DF Walker loan in May 2022, are not what the Holmes High School USDA loan received at either the

$50M or the $85M tier.

The Holmes High School USDA loan, at $85M authorized and approximately $81.2M audited (per Chowan

County FY 2024 audit, p. 73), is roughly twenty times the size of the $4.2M jail buy-in the Board is carefully

reviewing. The smaller decision is receiving the careful, structured review the larger one did not.

 

Thank you for your consideration.

Respectfully,

Kim Ringeisen

=============================================

 

Supporting Material

Timeline at a glance

Date Event Forum Public input format

Sept 17, 2019 Holmes HS hearing at ~$50M

(under then-active bond

approach)

Special joint BOC + BOE Publicly advertised hearing

on project scope

 

Aug 26, 2020 MB Kahn rep tells Board:

Camden must return funds if

its bond fails

BOC special meeting Three-minute public comment

 

Nov 3, 2020 Ό’ Article 46 sales tax for

Holmes HS

Election Voter referendum (rejected

52.56-47.44)

 

March 22, 2021 USDA financing presented

(Davenport); MB Kahn rep

Ott advises on USDA loan

timing

Joint BOC + BOE Committee Three-minute public comment

 

April 19, 2021 Authorization at $50M via

USDA loan (7-0)

BOC regular meeting Three-minute public comment

 

Feb 14, 2022 USDA-required feasibility

study commissioned

BOC emergency meeting Three-minute public comment

 

May 2, 2022 DF Walker loan publicly

advertised hearing

BOC regular meeting Publicly advertised hearing

on the loan

 

June 20, 2022 USDA loan status update BOC regular meeting Three-minute public comment

 

Sept 5, 2023 Increase to $85M ceiling

(7-0)

BOC regular meeting Three-minute public comment

 

Dec 5, 2023 LGC approves $35.0M USDA loan

NC LGC consent agenda None at LGC

 

June 17, 2024 FY 2024-25 budget adopted;

rate +3’ to $0.695

BOC budget hearing Budget hearing

 

Feb 3, 2025 Tech Package change order,

$103,139.45

BOC regular meeting Three-minute public comment

 

May 19, 2025 A/V Package change order,

$612,777.73

BOC regular meeting Three-minute public comment

 

Aug 18, 2025 Window film change order,

$40,000

BOC regular meeting Three-minute public comment

 

May 18, 2026 Four further change orders /

contingency, ~$320,970

BOC regular meeting Three-minute

=======================================

Note: A response was received from the county and is posted here along with corrections to the above

 

In summary considering the county's response, the following is true:

FYI, this confirms that no financial analysis by Davenport on the total $85M, only the $50M.   It also clarifies that the noticed meetings did occur, however, they only covered the initial amount, not the $85M total.    That the state does not require a noticed meeting for increases or ceiling meetings, which is odd, but the county is in compliance with the status on meetings and notifications based on this new finding.    Still, citizens at the two meetings did not understand the $85M total or tax implications because they focused on the initial amount that stated no tax implications